Stay informed. Stay inspired. Subscribe to our email list.

Close X
  • Join
  •     |    
  • Login
  •     |    
Log in

« Back to Resources

Community-Based Monitoring: When Does it Work? Evidence from Uganda

Community Driven Development (CDD) is one of the most frequently advocated processes for managing and implementing (local) development programs. The CDD approach operates on the principles of participatory governance (stimulate participation by intended beneficiaries) as a mechanism to strengthen demand-responsiveness and local accountability.

This paper provides evidence of impact of the CDD approach in a context — primary health care delivery in Uganda — previously shown to be conducive to this kind of process interventions. We contrast the results of the CDD intervention with a more elaborated intervention that adds dissemination of information on what the beneficiaries should expect and are currently experiencing. The CDD intervention had little measurable impact on health workers’ performance or the quantity and quality of health care in the short and medium run, while the intervention combining information and participation showed significant improvements in both health care delivery and health outcomes after four years. Taken together, the evidence suggests that enhanced participation alone has little impact without changing the underlying informational asymmetries. Interventions that relax these informational constraints, and provide communities with a clear agenda, however, can result in large and sustained long run improvements in both health service provision and health outcomes.

Uploaded on: Dec 16, 2015
Last Updated: Dec 18, 2015
Year Published: 2012

Resource Tags

Resource Type: Impact Evidence Issues: Community Organizing, Governance, Accountability & Transparency, Health Tool Type: Reports / Research Method: Improving Governance, Accountability and Transparency, Promoting Citizens' Participation in Governance Languages: English Regions: Uganda Nature of Impact: Acquisition of Remedy / Entitlement / Information, Citizen Action & Participation, Rights Consciousness Scale of Intervention/Impact: 10,000 to 100,000 people Institutions Engaged: NGOs Evaluation Method: Surveys