Stay informed. Stay inspired. Subscribe to our email list.

Close X
  • Join
  •     |    
  • Login
  •     |    
Log in
Join

« Back to Resources

Engaging with Customary Law to Create Scope for Realizing Women’s Formally Protected Land Rights in Rwanda

In rural Rwanda, women, particularly widows and divorced or abandoned women, face severe obstacles protecting and upholding their interests in land, resulting in diminishing land tenure security. Women have weak rights under customary law, and while reforms have strengthened their statutory land rights, such entitlements have limited practical value in rural areas where customary law dominates.

This research was launched to investigate the types of interventions that might improve the likelihood that women’s land interests would be upheld in the context of customary dispute resolution. It was hypothesized that women would receive better outcomes if land-related disputes were resolved consistently at the village level, through mediation by a wider group of stakeholders, including representatives of a women’s interest group. The results demonstrate that it may be possible to widen the scope for women’s land claims without modifying the substantive aspects of customary law, provided that such outcomes do not sit too uncomfortably with the overarching structure of the customary framework. This tool discusses the results of this research and draws conclusions that may be useful both for rule of law programming in Rwanda and in similar country contexts.

Share:      
Uploaded on: Feb 10, 2014
Last Updated: Feb 27, 2017
Year Published: 2011


Resource Tags

Resource Type: Practitioner Resources Issues: Environmental Justice, Traditional / Customary Justice, Women's Rights Tool Type: Training Resources & Popular Education Method: Mediation & Conflict Resolution, Strengthening Customary Justice Systems Languages: English Regions: Sub-Saharan Africa Nature of Impact: Conflict resolution / Case resolution, Sense of fair process, Status change Institutions Engaged: Court, Elders, Traditional / Customary Authorities Evaluation Method: Focus group discussions, Interviews, Observation