Stay informed. Stay inspired. Subscribe to our email list.

Close X
  • Join
  •     |    
  • Login
  •     |    
Log in

« Back to Resources

Peer Effects, Pupil-Teacher Ratios, and Teacher Incentives: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya

This paper was published by the American Economic Review.

This paper reports on a project designed to provide experimental evidence on several questions regarding resource allocation in primary education: the impact of pupil-teacher ratios, tracking, and the institutional environment (teacher contracts and beneficiary control). The project involved 210 primary schools in Western Kenya. We find that in this context, reducing the pupil-teacher ratio (from 80 to 46 on average), in the absence of any other reform, lead to reduced teacher effort, and to small and insignificant increases in test scores. In contrast, combining class size reduction with improved incentives (either by hiring local teachers on short term contract or by increasing parental oversight) leads to significantly larger test score increases. Finally, combining class size reduction with tracking by initial achievement leads to large test score increases, regardless of a child’s initial achievement, suggesting that students benefits from homogenous classes. In contrast, we find no evidence that test scores are affected by the average pretest score of their peers.

Uploaded on: Dec 02, 2015
Last Updated: Dec 04, 2015
Year Published: 2007

Resource Tags

Resource Type: Impact Evidence Issues: Education, Governance, Accountability & Transparency Method: Improving Governance, Accountability and Transparency, Promoting Citizens' Participation in Governance Languages: English Regions: Sub-Saharan Africa Nature of Impact: Change in institutional / government practice, Impact on Education Scale of Intervention/Impact: 10,000 to 100,000 people Institutions Engaged: Service Delivery Agencies Evaluation Method: Observation, Randomized Control Trials