Namati

Power with: Practice Models for Social Justice Lawyering

By: Michael Grinthal, Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository

Public interest lawyers seeking justice for marginalized groups cannot succeed by working alone. Meaningful social change occurs when marginalized and dispersed peoples unite and organize to take power into their own hands. Such groups benefit greatly by forming relationships with lawyers and including them in their organizing processes. However, existing attorney-client models are inadequate to structure such relationships between lawyers and people in the process of organizing. Traditional paradigms of group representation are designed either for fully-formed, established, and hierarchized groups (e.g., corporate representation) or for constituencies who remain atomized and relatively passive throughout representation (e.g., impact litigation and class actions). The inadequacy of existing models hinders public interest lawyers’ imaginations and makes it difficult for them to structure efficacious, accountable relationships with the groups with whom they work. This paper addresses that inadequacy by defining and illustrating five concrete models of practice for lawyers representing groups in the process of organizing for power and social change.

Download Resource
Share:      
Uploaded on: Nov 26, 2018
Year Published: 2011
Resource Tags
Resource Type

Target Population

Languages

Regions

Stay Informed

  • Get regular updates on the latest developments and opportunities in legal empowerment around the world. You can unsubscribe at any time.

    Learn how we protect and use your information in our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Join the Network

Be part of the movement for legal empowerment.

Meet practitioners from around the world, access practical resources, and join learning exchanges.

Sign Up